What methods can and should philosophy apply in order to make progress? The answer to this question largely depends on what questions we believe philosophy should address.

Fortunately, Niklas Grouols and Laura Martena from the University of Cologne will provide a great opportunity to discuss these issues. They invited great philosophers to give talks on what philosophy aims to achieve and what methods they have at their disposal to do so. And experimental philosophy is definitely one of those methods that deserves attention but also asks for a very careful and conscious reflection. That’s where I will come in!

In my talk, I will argue that moral philosophy can benefit greatly from experimental work. Many researchers already accept that moral philosophy needs a solid empirical foundation and that philosophers need to be aware of relevant studies in the empirical sciences. There is yet large disagreement on the extent to which such evidence matters. Are empirical facts about, say, human psychology equally relevant to a metaethics, normative ethics and applied ethics? In addition, the new methodological approach called experimental philosophy raises additional questions. Why should philosophers care about conducting experiments themselves? One might argue that this is not what they are trained to do and not what they are supposed to do.
In my talk I will argue for the necessity of a naturalistic, empirically informed moral philosophy. And I will further argue that experimental philosophy provides an invaluable opportunity for philosophers to take matters in their own hand and not only be recipients of empirical data, but generate them themselves and tailored to their specific needs. I will use a couple of very concrete examples from experimental philosophy to make this case, e.g. from debates about free will, moral responsibility, and thick ethical concepts.


1 2
February 18th, 2020

Presentation Slides: Separability and the Effect of Valence

Thick concepts like courage and intolerance are at the heart of a variety of debates in linguistics, philosophy of language, […]

February 18th, 2020

Pre-print available: Basic and derivative moral responsibility: An overlooked distinction in experimental philosophy

Abstract Moral philosophers draw an important distinction between two kinds of moral responsibility. An agent can be directly morally responsible, […]

November 13th, 2019

I’ll be giving a talk in Cologne, 5 – 7 December 2019

What methods can and should philosophy apply in order to make progress? The answer to this question largely depends on […]

November 13th, 2019

I’ll be giving a talk in Zurich, 14 – 16 November 2019

If you’re around Zurich, please join the amazing workshop that Hans-Joachim Glock, Elia Haemmerli, and Kevin Reuter have put together. The topic […]

March 18th, 2019

New Publication

I am excited to announce that my paper The Relevance of Alternative Possibilities for Moral Responsibility is about to be […]

January 22nd, 2019

My first book awaits your order!

December 30th, 2018

Talk at the APA Eastern Division

On Wednesday, January 9 2019, I will be giving a talk at the American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division. If you’re […]

December 17th, 2018

Guest Appearance at Quarks

Organ donation is giving an organ to someone else who needs a transplant. In many cases when we talk about […]

November 10th, 2018

GdF Prize for Outstanding Interdisciplinary Dissertations

I recently won a prize for the best interdisciplinary dissertation at Ruhr-University Bochum. Thanks to the Freunde der Ruhr-University Bochum!

November 10th, 2018

New Publication

If you’re interested in causal cognition, it is very hard these days not to engage with empirical evidence indicating that […]